Nick at Unicycle raises an interesting point about whether to upload to JorumOpen only links if the resources already exist online.
I remember this was also raised at the startup meeting in June.
Here at OTTER we’re going to upload both links and resources. One of our OER partners at Leicester is the Virtual Genetics Education Centre in the Department of Genetics. VGEC already have a superb collection of OERs hosted by themselves.
OTTER will be taking a selection of these OERs and running them through Sahm’s workflow process. Some of them will change as a result. For example, OTTER will make some of the VGEC videos available as downloadable mp4 chunks to be viewed on an iPod/iPhone.
As an example, watch the video on Using a micropipette. Being able to refer to this video, or parts of it, on a handheld device in the lab would seem to make it a very useful resource.
So we intend to upload both the VGEC link to the full video plus the various files we produce (which will also include the full video). Visitors to JorumOpen can decide which resource best fits their needs. (Of course, we’ll also replicate this on our Plone site.)
VGEC, who are already producing some excellent OERs, came on board for a number of reasons. However, two important ones were accessing JorumOpen and having other pairs of eyes run over the existing material.
It’s considerably more work to upload files as well as links, but the benefits to the user are considerable, especially in terms of untethering and re-purposing.
It may not always be feasible and worthwhile for all OERs (i.e. a link may be the best option), but setting out with the idea of providing both the files and the link to JorumOpen seems the best starting point, and our experience thus far is bearing this out.
I’d be interested to hear what others think.